PSIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 16.14% compared to Power Solutions International's net margin of -2.72%. Power Solutions International's return on equity of 263.56% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

Power Solutions International has a consensus price target of $64.00, signalling upside risk potential of 144.37%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 170.27%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Power Solutions International, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Power Solutions International.

Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.672% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.703, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.295%.

Power Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Solutions International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Power Solutions International quarterly revenues are $144.3M, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. Power Solutions International's net income of $23.3M is higher than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, Power Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 27.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Solutions International is 1.27x versus 0.23x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of 16.14% compared to Power Solutions International's net margin of 1.78%. Power Solutions International's return on equity of 263.56% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53%.

Power Solutions International has a consensus price target of $64.00, signalling upside risk potential of 144.37%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 426.32%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Power Solutions International, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Power Solutions International.

Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.672% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.09%.

Power Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Solutions International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Power Solutions International quarterly revenues are $144.3M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Power Solutions International's net income of $23.3M is higher than CVD Equipment's net income of $132K. Notably, Power Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Solutions International is 1.27x versus 0.77x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 16.14% compared to Power Solutions International's net margin of -814.55%. Power Solutions International's return on equity of 263.56% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Power Solutions International has a consensus price target of $64.00, signalling upside risk potential of 144.37%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Power Solutions International has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Power Solutions International is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.672% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.665%.

Power Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Solutions International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Power Solutions International quarterly revenues are $144.3M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Power Solutions International's net income of $23.3M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Power Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Solutions International is 1.27x versus 7.62x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 16.14% compared to Power Solutions International's net margin of -11.09%. Power Solutions International's return on equity of 263.56% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Power Solutions International has a consensus price target of $64.00, signalling upside risk potential of 144.37%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 335.04%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Power Solutions International, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Power Solutions International.

Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.672% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.953%.

Power Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Solutions International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Power Solutions International quarterly revenues are $144.3M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Power Solutions International's net income of $23.3M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Power Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Solutions International is 1.27x versus 0.22x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.